AIHR
10% HRPA Georgia discount not yet applied.
Apply now
HR Leaders

CHROs Are Failing and It’s Our Fault: 5 Barriers to CHRO Career Success

By Marna van der Merwe, Dieter Veldsman

In brief

  • The CHRO role’s complexity and internal challenges deter many from aspiring to it, despite its critical importance. This highlights the need to address these barriers to attract and retain top HR leadership.
  • Additionally, the CHRO role has evolved from heading HR to a business leadership position with expanded scope, including ESG, digitalization, and a complex stakeholder landscape.
  • There are five challenges that CHROs indicate inhibit their success in the role. These include power, politics and unpredictability, lack of legitimacy, a lack of belonging, inheriting and navigating historical HR leader failures, and perception that CHROs “serve” at the CEO’s discretion.
  • A change is required in how CHROs are developed. We propose a three-pronged approach that considers the ecosystem needed for CHROs to be effective.

The CHRO role is notoriously difficult and complex, leaving many CHROs feeling ill-equipped and unprepared. Politics, a complex stakeholder environment, and Board dynamics are some challenges new CHROs face. For many, this makes the role unappealing. 

Only 40% of senior HR leaders say that they have the ambition to move into the CHRO role, while senior HR leader turnover is reported to be significantly higher than in other C-suite roles. Contrary to what many believe, this is not a symptom of the role’s demands — more often, it is due to significant internal barriers that CHROs face.

In this article, we draw on our latest research to discuss the current reality of CHRO careers, how the role changes, and the unique challenges we must address to set the role up for success. 

The reality of the CHRO role: Changing expectations and scope

The CHRO role has significantly changed over the last decade. Even before the pandemic, the CHRO scope changed to include the inclusion of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) as a critical strategic priority. Similarly, the digitalization of HR and the rising importance of board oversight on people matters have significantly impacted the role’s focus.

In the past, the CHRO was seen as a leader of the HR function, accountable to the business it supports. However, the CHRO role has changed into a business leadership role. The CHRO now holds accountability to the Board and leadership responsibility within the C-suite while also ensuring that the function is set up and enabled to deliver sustainably. 

Beyond the evolution of the scope and responsibilities of the CHRO role, the reality of talent in CHROs highlights significant challenges. Recent rates show that the turnover (14%) within top HR roles is higher than in other C-suite roles.

Similarly, the internal promotion rates for CHROs are much lower than their C-suite counterparts, at only 57%. This signals that the CHRO role is not set up for success within the business and requires urgency in developing CHROs for the future and addressing the symptoms of underlying challenges.

The scope
The past
The present

Positioning of the role

Seen as Head of the HR team

Business leader responsible for leading HR

Value of the role

Aligning HR with business priorities and future-proofing the business

Proactively infusing the people sustainability agenda into strategic business operations

Anticipated impact

Return on people investment, managing people risk

Business continuity, ESG, talent and wellbeing

Complexity of the stakeholder landscape

Multi-level stakeholder relationships with the Board, C-suite, and Leaders

Multi-faceted relationship with industry, community, Board, C-suite and Leaders

5 challenges inhibiting the success of the CHRO role

CHROs state that they experience five barriers to success:

Barrier 1: Power, politics and unpredictability

By its nature, the CHRO role is at the heart of complex relationships and organizational politics. This results in CHROs spending significant time and effort managing relationships across the organization and navigating politics. To make this practical, CHROs often spend more time navigating organizational demands rather than focusing on activities that lead to strategic HR impact. 

When reflecting on their careers, many CHROs say that they felt ill-prepared to work with the Board and C-suite, and managing conflicting agendas and dynamics contributed to their feeling of being an imposter within the C-suite.

Many CHROs share that they don’t feel fully prepared for the role. As many as 41% of CHROs advanced from the HRBP role, with 29% moving into the role from outside of HR. This means that CHROs enter the role with varying skill sets and exposure, which might not always align with the role’s expectations.

“It’s really about having difficult conversations and standing your ground with leaders. And it is something that you learn over time or as a personality trait, but you don’t learn that in the books.”—Senior HR professional.

Barrier 2: Lack of institutional legitimacy

The CHRO role is often not given credibility within the organization, holding very little power and autonomy. In some organizations, this is explicit – the CHRO is not seen as part of the executive leadership team. In others, the role is included at face value but holds no real influence or power. CHRO decision-making power and autonomy are often diluted at the C-suite level, which contrasts the expectations that CHROs hold of the role.

CHROs impact business, society, and people. However, once they enter the role, they struggle to build trust and credibility with leadership, often feel isolated and not part of the C-suite, and struggle to manage overwhelming expectations and decision-making responsibilities. This leaves many CHROs feeling disempowered and needing more agency to drive the strategic HR agenda.

“As a new CHRO, the title held very little power, given the organization’s history. Even though reporting to the CEO, the role at the start had very little access to the rest of Group Exco, did not have a formal exco seat – yet was expected to deliver on the strategic people agenda without much context or support. I had responsibility but not the power to take the actions required to make the role a success.” – CHRO.

Barrier 3: The CHRO role is lonely

CHROs report that being elevated into the CHRO role often brings a sense of loneliness and lack of belonging. On the one hand, the CHRO is considered the people leader of the HR function and represents business leadership in meetings. On the other hand, they do not feel fully integrated into the business executive team. This leads to dissatisfaction with the role, with only 52% of CHROs reporting that they are satisfied with their careers.

Chief Human Resources Officers also experience little support in their roles, resulting in burnout, disengagement, and often premature exits from the profession. This poses a significant risk to the readiness and availability of experienced CHROs. Many CHROs remark that being the ‘outlier’ in the C-suite (treated differently than other functions) and advocating for the HR function and profession creates a challenging and lonely environment, which was not anticipated in the role.

“You have to work with a leader who is prepared to defend you; otherwise, it becomes very lonely.” – Senior HR Professional.
“The career is a challenging one in a way because you’re helping people all the time, but you don’t always feel that you are getting help yourself.” – Senior HR Professional.

Barrier 4: Carrying the burden of HR’s past

Thirty-eight percent of CHROs progress into the role through upward advancement and promotions. While this leads to solid business acumen and an understanding of the organizational context, it often diminishes HR’s credibility and ability to transition into a C-suite leader. “Growing up in the business” brings with it the responsibility of carrying the history of previous HR leaders while also being seen as part of historical failures.

Where HR has been established as a successful contributor under a strong leader, new CHROs carry the burden of being measured against their predecessors and continuously compared to them—which is especially true if the new CHRO grew within the business under the leadership of the previous incumbent. Even though this is not unique, given the intimate stakeholder relationships that successful CHROs hold, it often makes it difficult for new incumbents to establish their brand.

“(This) is also what I experienced at my previous companies – if you’re internal, sometimes it is more difficult to get people on board. And when you’re external and you say no, then they often don’t do it because they really see you as an expert.” – Fractional CHRO

Barrier 5: A perception that CHROs “serve” at the CEO’s discretion

The relationship between the CEO and CHRO contributes significantly to the role’s success. This relationship also often dictates the accessibility of the CHRO in terms of key strategic discussions and its critical role in managing board dynamics.

Unlike the relationship between the CEO and other C-suite executives, there is a close link between the perceived credibility of the CHRO and the CEO. CHROs mention that working for a CEO where they align with the values and ways of work significantly contributes to their own career decisions. 

To put this practically, a CHRO is 2x more likely to leave the role following a CEO transition, with the likelihood of this churn increasing to 54% within the first 24 months. 

“One of the reasons I’m leaving this role is because of the sense of disconnect with the leadership vision and action. One of the reasons I accepted the role is because I have a strong sense of clarity of vision and trust from senior leadership.” – Senior HR professional.

Given the changing nature of the CHRO role, the current CHRO talent development approach cannot overcome these challenges. Similarly, the impact CHROs can make is lessened because of institutional factors inhibiting their performance. These challenges and changing expectations set the stage for the future CHRO profile. They will significantly influence the development of a healthy and sustainable CHRO talent pipeline.

What should we be doing to create a healthy CHRO talent pool?

We need to change how we develop CHROs. Traditional upskilling will not be enough. We propose a three-pronged approach that considers the ecosystem needed for CHROs to be effective.

Individual level

CHROs must reflect on their skills and experience to identify gaps and proactively address them to build confidence to prepare for the role. Beyond the required skills, CHROs also have to demonstrate clarity in their belief system and how this impacts their professional identity.

This is essential for making tough calls, navigating ambiguity, and remaining true to purpose. Self-awareness is essential in any leadership role, but for CHROs, the ability to reflect and make sense of their strengths and limitations is even more critical.

Organizational level

The organization plays a key part in creating an environment where CHROs can thrive. On the one hand, this requires clearly defining the contribution and expectations of the CHRO role and giving it appropriate decision-making authority.

This means legitimizing the role, its positioning within the C-suite, and its power and influence. It also requires a proactive approach to CHRO succession planning and feeder pool development to ensure the role’s readiness and continuity.

Profession level

Beyond the organization, the HR profession as a collective also needs to address past perceptions about why the HR profession exists and the type of work it is responsible for. The baggage of the past often impacts the credibility of the CHRO or even demotivates individuals from entering the profession in the first place.

Also, the profession needs to establish communities of support, coaching, and mentorship to ensure that CHROs receive tangible support in transitioning into the role and navigating the loneliness of the profession.


 A call to action

The scarcity of qualified CHRO talent poses a real threat to organizations’ capacity to cultivate sustainable workplaces in the future. The hurdles confronting the CHRO role demand innovative solutions, as current strategies prove inadequate. HR cannot solve this challenge on its own. It will require a concerted effort that will include multiple parties changing the current perceptions of the role, its value, and the credibility of those who step into the responsibility. 

Stay updated and subscribe to the monthly Leading HR newsletter and LinkedIn page. Our experts provide curated trends and cutting-edge thinking for HR leaders.
Contents
CHROs Are Failing and It’s Our Fault: 5 Barriers to CHRO Career Success

About the Authors

Marna van der MerweHR Subject Matter Expert
Dr. Marna van der Merwe is an Organizational Psychologist and Subject Matter Expert at AIHR. She has extensive experience in Human Resources, Organizational Effectiveness and Strategic Talent Management. She is a researcher, published author and regular conference speaker in the areas of talent management, experience design, as well as the changing nature of careers. Marna holds a PhD in Organizational Psychology, with a specific focus on talent management and careers in the future of work.
Get in touch:
Dieter VeldsmanChief HR Scientist
Dr. Dieter Veldsman is an Organizational Psychologist with 15+ years of experience across the HR value chain and lifecycle, having worked for and consulted with various organizations in EMEA, APAC, and LATAM. He has held the positions of Group Chief People Officer, Organizational Effectiveness Executive, Director of Consulting Solutions, and Chief Research Scientist. He is a regular speaker on the topics of Strategic HR, Future of Work, Employee Experience, and Organizational Development.
Get in touch:
Go to Top
Get the Latest HR
Insights & Analysis
Sign up to our monthly Leading HR newsletter. Actionable HR insights delivered straight to your inbox.
Send this to a friend